Postsynaptic cell firing triggers bidirectional metaplasticity depending on the LTP induction protocol.

Cell firing has been reported to variably upregulate or downregulate subsequently induced long-term potentiation (LTP). The aim of this study was to elucidate the parameters critical to driving each direction of the metaplasticity effect. The main focus was on the commonly used θ-burst stimulation (TBS) and high-frequency stimulation (HFS) protocols that are known to trigger distinct intracellular signaling cascades. To study action potential (AP)-induced metaplasticity, we used intracellular recordings from CA1 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampal slices. Somatic current injections were used to induce θ-burst firing (TBF) or high-frequency firing (HFF) for priming purposes, whereas LTP was induced 15 min later via TBS of Schaffer collaterals in stratum radiatum. TBS-LTP was inhibited by both priming protocols. Conversely, HFS-LTP was facilitated by HFF priming but not affected by TBF priming. Interestingly, both priming protocols reduced AP firing during TBS-LTP induction, and this effect correlated with the reduction of TBS-LTP. However, LTP was not rescued by restoring AP firing with somatic current injections during the TBS. Analysis of intrinsic properties revealed few changes, apart from a priming-induced increase in the medium afterhyperpolarization (HFF priming) and a decrease in the EPSP amplitude/slope ratio (TBF priming), which could in principle contribute to the inhibition of TBS-LTP by reducing depolarization and associated Ca2+ influx following synaptic activity or AP backpropagation. Overall, these data indicate that the more physiological TBS protocol for inducing LTP is particularly susceptible to homeostatic feedback inhibition by prior bouts of postsynaptic cell firing.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The induction of LTP in the hippocampus was bidirectionally regulated by prior postsynaptic cell firing, with θ-burst stimulation-induced LTP being consistently impaired by prior spiking, whereas high-frequency stimulation-induced LTP was either not changed or facilitated. Reductions in cell firing during LTP induction did not explain the LTP impairment. Overall, different patterns of postsynaptic firing induce distinct intracellular changes that can increase or decrease LTP depending on the induction protocol.

Electrophysiological Investigation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Dependent Metaplasticity in the Hippocampus.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are one of the major types of glutamatergic receptors contributing to synaptic plasticity mechanisms such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression. Interestingly, activation of mGluRs alone can engage metaplastic mechanisms that create a new neuronal state, facilitating the induction and maintenance of future LTP. Here we describe typical methods used to investigate mGluR-induced metaplasticity in acute hippocampal slices. While this chapter focuses on in vitro field electrophysiological investigations, many of the principles can be applied to single-cell recordings as well as in vivo electrophysiology and indeed many types of metaplasticity phenomena.

The malleable brain: plasticity of neural circuits and behavior - a review from students to students.

One of the most intriguing features of the brain is its ability to be malleable, allowing it to adapt continually to changes in the environment. Specific neuronal activity patterns drive long-lasting increases or decreases in the strength of synaptic connections, referred to as long-term potentiation and long-term depression, respectively. Such phenomena have been described in a variety of model organisms, which are used to study molecular, structural, and functional aspects of synaptic plasticity. This review originated from the first International Society for Neurochemistry (ISN) and Journal of Neurochemistry (JNC) Flagship School held in Alpbach, Austria (Sep 2016), and will use its curriculum and discussions as a framework to review some of the current knowledge in the field of synaptic plasticity. First, we describe the role of plasticity during development and the persistent changes of neural circuitry occurring when sensory input is altered during critical developmental stages. We then outline the signaling cascades resulting in the synthesis of new plasticity-related proteins, which ultimately enable sustained changes in synaptic strength. Going beyond the traditional understanding of synaptic plasticity conceptualized by long-term potentiation and long-term depression, we discuss system-wide modifications and recently unveiled homeostatic mechanisms, such as synaptic scaling. Finally, we describe the neural circuits and synaptic plasticity mechanisms driving associative memory and motor learning. Evidence summarized in this review provides a current view of synaptic plasticity in its various forms, offers new insights into the underlying mechanisms and behavioral relevance, and provides directions for future research in the field of synaptic plasticity. Read the Editorial Highlight for this article on page 788. Cover Image for this issue: doi: 10.1111/jnc.13815.